The Head of Media and Strategic Communications for the Obidient Movement, Nana Kazaure, has voiced strong dissatisfaction with several individuals included in President Bola Tinubu’s recently proposed list of ambassadorial nominees.
Speaking during an interview on Arise Television’s Prime Time on Friday night, Kazaure argued that a number of the nominees carry serious ethical and legal baggage. She alleged that some of them are currently facing unresolved corruption cases, while others have previously made inflammatory remarks about President Tinubu himself.
Kazaure insisted that such individuals should never be considered for high-level diplomatic roles, stressing that their inclusion undermines public confidence in national institutions.
According to her, Nigerians deserve clarity and accountability concerning the backgrounds of those nominated to represent the country abroad.
She stated, “Honestly, many of the names on that list raise red flags. These are people who should be answering serious questions before the law. Some have active EFCC cases that have not reached any conclusion, yet they are now being positioned for ambassadorial appointments. What message does that send about our commitment to integrity?”
Kazaure further questioned the rationale behind rewarding individuals who have previously criticized or maligned the President, describing the situation as an indictment of Nigeria’s governance systems. She added that the decision sidelines qualified career diplomats who have dedicated their lives to foreign service, only to be overlooked at the height of their professional journeys.
“We have Nigerians who have been trained, tested, and have demonstrated the temperament and discipline required for diplomatic service. Instead of promoting them, we are elevating people with questionable histories. That is why there is widespread dissatisfaction with this list,” she said.
Kazaure urged the Senate to thoroughly examine each nomination and address the inconsistencies, including reports that two nominees bear identical names. “Nigerians need explanations. The Senate must dig into these issues because credibility is at stake—both locally and internationally,” she emphasized.
Her comments add to the growing debate surrounding the ambassadorial list, which has sparked criticism from citizens, analysts, and civil society groups concerned about transparency and merit in public appointments.
0 Comments